Implicit reboxing of unboxed tuple in let-patterns

[Richard Eisenberg]

> On Sep 3, 2020, at 12:10 PM, Spiwack, Arnaud <arnaud.spiwack at tweag.io> wrote:
> 
> This is all a tad tricky, I must say.

... which is one of the reasons I originally wanted one simple rule. I'm not now saying I was in the right, but it is an attractive resting point for this discussion.

To be clear, I don't think there's going to be any concrete action here without a proposal, so perhaps once this thread finds a resting point different than the status quo, someone will have to write it up.

Richard
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20200903/75c73f6d/attachment.html>