GHC 9.0?

[Ben Gamari]

"Alan & Kim Zimmerman" <alan.zimm at gmail.com> writes:

> Which sounds like we have agreed on 9.0?
>
I've not heard any objections so I am happy to push through the change.
However, I'm waiting another day before formally announcing. The earlier
email was a bit of a slip on my part.

If anyone sees a good reason why with the coming release shouldn't be
numbered 9.0, speak now or forever hold your speech.

Cheers,

- Ben
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 487 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20200722/c267b25b/attachment.sig>