ByteArray# as a foreign import argument?

chessai . chessai1996 at gmail.com
Thu Oct 10 21:31:59 UTC 2019


I just tried this and got an error message: "Unacceptable argument type in
foreign declaration: 'MutableByteArray s' cannot be marshalled in a foreign
call"

I got a similar error message when switching ByteArray# to ByteArray.

On Thu, Oct 10, 2019, 5:28 PM chessai . <chessai1996 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Can you do that? I know with the UnliftedFFI you can use ByteArray# and if
> you have something like uint8_t*, it will make sure that the pointer lines
> up with the payload of the ByteArray#. You could always just wrap it in
> Data.Primitive.ByteArray.ByteArray, no? That is to say, I don't think GHC
> can do what you're asking.
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019, 4:10 PM Shao, Cheng <cheng.shao at tweag.io> wrote:
>
>> Yes, and specifically, the lifted ByteArray type as described in the
>> comments, not the unlifted ByteArray# type.
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 4:00 AM Csaba Hruska <csaba.hruska at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Sorry, maybe I got it wrong. Are you asking if is there any package
>> that passes ByteArrays via FFI?
>> >
>> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 8:54 PM Csaba Hruska <csaba.hruska at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> It's a primitive type.
>> >>
>> https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/blob/master/compiler/prelude/primops.txt.pp#L1388
>> >> https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/wikis/commentary/prim-ops
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Csaba
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 8:16 PM Shao, Cheng <cheng.shao at tweag.io>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hello devs,
>> >>>
>> >>> I've been trying to figure out how to pass lifted types as foreign
>> >>> types, then encountered the following code in the `DsCCall` module
>> >>> (
>> https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/blob/master/compiler/deSugar/DsCCall.hs#L172
>> ):
>> >>>
>> >>> ```
>> >>>   -- Byte-arrays, both mutable and otherwise; hack warning
>> >>>   -- We're looking for values of type ByteArray, MutableByteArray
>> >>>   --    data ByteArray          ix = ByteArray        ix ix ByteArray#
>> >>>   --    data MutableByteArray s ix = MutableByteArray ix ix
>> >>> (MutableByteArray# s)
>> >>>   | is_product_type &&
>> >>>     data_con_arity == 3 &&
>> >>>     isJust maybe_arg3_tycon &&
>> >>>     (arg3_tycon ==  byteArrayPrimTyCon ||
>> >>>      arg3_tycon ==  mutableByteArrayPrimTyCon)
>> >>>   = do case_bndr <- newSysLocalDs arg_ty
>> >>>        vars@[_l_var, _r_var, arr_cts_var] <- newSysLocalsDs
>> data_con_arg_tys
>> >>>        return (Var arr_cts_var,
>> >>>                \ body -> Case arg case_bndr (exprType body) [(DataAlt
>> >>> data_con,vars,body)]
>> >>>               )
>> >>> ```
>> >>>
>> >>> It seems we allow a "ByteArray" type as a foreign import argument, if
>> >>> the third field of the datacon is a ByteArray# or MutableByteArray#.
>> >>> But I can't find such a ByteArray type definition in today's common
>> >>> packages. What's the rationale for this piece of code?
>> >>>
>> >>> Cheers,
>> >>> Cheng
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> ghc-devs mailing list
>> >>> ghc-devs at haskell.org
>> >>> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
>> _______________________________________________
>> ghc-devs mailing list
>> ghc-devs at haskell.org
>> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20191010/b2f7489a/attachment.html>


More information about the ghc-devs mailing list