Issue weight migration
Simon Peyton Jones
simonpj at microsoft.com
Mon Jul 8 08:22:19 UTC 2019
Thanks Ben. Did we agree to have
* 3 explicit labels (high, normal, low)
* With absence of a label indicating "has not been assigned a priority"
which you can also read as "needs triage".
I would strongly prefer not to have
"no label" = "low priority"
as I described earlier
Simon
| -----Original Message-----
| From: ghc-devs <ghc-devs-bounces at haskell.org> On Behalf Of Ben Gamari
| Sent: 07 July 2019 18:32
| To: GHC developers <ghc-devs at haskell.org>
| Subject: Issue weight migration
|
| Hi everyone,
|
| Today I will run the migration moving the information encoded in issue
| weights to priority labels, as discussed on this list last week [1].
|
| Cheers,
|
| - Ben
|
|
| [1]
| https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmail.ha
| skell.org%2Fpipermail%2Fghc-devs%2F2019-
| July%2F017851.html&data=02%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Cf79dfc3d0
| 20e46af165f08d70301164c%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C6369
| 81175530582443&sdata=e47yXB%2B5Ox69IjV2TNcOWnKXZVa5zpFN7L9Bcga4E%2F8%
| 3D&reserved=0
More information about the ghc-devs
mailing list