Issue weight migration

Simon Peyton Jones simonpj at microsoft.com
Mon Jul 8 08:22:19 UTC 2019


Thanks Ben.   Did we agree to have

* 3 explicit labels (high, normal, low)

* With absence of a label indicating "has not been assigned a priority"
  which you can also read as "needs triage".


I would strongly prefer not to have 
  "no label" = "low priority"
as I described earlier

Simon

|  -----Original Message-----
|  From: ghc-devs <ghc-devs-bounces at haskell.org> On Behalf Of Ben Gamari
|  Sent: 07 July 2019 18:32
|  To: GHC developers <ghc-devs at haskell.org>
|  Subject: Issue weight migration
|  
|  Hi everyone,
|  
|  Today I will run the migration moving the information encoded in issue
|  weights to priority labels, as discussed on this list last week [1].
|  
|  Cheers,
|  
|  - Ben
|  
|  
|  [1]
|  https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmail.ha
|  skell.org%2Fpipermail%2Fghc-devs%2F2019-
|  July%2F017851.html&data=02%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Cf79dfc3d0
|  20e46af165f08d70301164c%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C6369
|  81175530582443&sdata=e47yXB%2B5Ox69IjV2TNcOWnKXZVa5zpFN7L9Bcga4E%2F8%
|  3D&reserved=0


More information about the ghc-devs mailing list