Weight field in issues too fine grained?

[Ben Gamari]

Ömer Sinan Ağacan <omeragacan at gmail.com> writes:

> I think we may want two different weights "high" and "highest".
>
> - Highest: regressions, incorrect results, runtime panics/crashes. These are
>   release blockers.
> - High: other bugs
>
> Other than that this sounds good to me.
>
A fair point. Sounds fine to me.

> I don't remember how many kinds of priorities we had in trac but IIRC it used to
> work well, I think we can just copy the old priorities as labels.
>
Trac had lowest, low, normal, high, and highest, IIRC.

Cheers,

- Ben
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 487 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20190702/087a996b/attachment.sig>