GitLab forks and submodules
Ben Gamari
ben at well-typed.com
Thu Jan 10 17:18:43 UTC 2019
Ömer Sinan Ağacan <omeragacan at gmail.com> writes:
>> As I mention in the documentation, those with commits bits should feel
>> free to push branches to ghc/ghc.
>
> This is sometimes not ideal as it wastes GHC's CI resources. For example I make
> a lot of WIP commits to my work branches, and I don't want to keep CI machines
> busy for those.
>
This is precisely why we have the two-phase CI configuration. It ensures
that obviously-wrong changes waste no more than two Linux builds worth of
effort. We currently have plenty of Linux capacity so I'm not terribly
worried about this.
Cheers,
- Ben
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 487 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20190110/ec3fcfcc/attachment.sig>
More information about the ghc-devs
mailing list