Writing a simple Core evaluator, having trouble with name lookups
Christopher Done
chrisdone at gmail.com
Tue Nov 27 17:59:38 UTC 2018
Hi all,
I'm attempting to make a simple evaluator for GHC core, but I'm not
clear on how to reliably looking up names. I'm compiling each of
ghc-prim, integer-simple and base with a patched version of GHC which
performs an extra output step with the Core AST to a file for each
module.
Later, I load those files in. So for an input Haskell file like this:
module Main (main,Foo(..)) where
class Foo a where foo :: a -> Int
instance Foo Int where foo x = x * x
instance Foo Char where foo x = 99
main = print (foo (123 :: Int))
I have an output set of bindings like this:
https://gist.github.com/chrisdone/cb05a77d3fcb081a4580b5f85289674a
One thing that I immediately notice is that the names of things are
completely non-unique, especially in generated names. So here are two
implementations of the method "foo" for the class "Foo":
( Id {idStableName = "main:Main:$cfoo", idUnique = Unique
6989586621679010917}, ...) -- Int
( Id {idStableName = "main:Main:$cfoo", idUnique = Unique
6989586621679010923}, ...) -- Char
So e.g. the instance for "Foo Int" refers to the above method
implementation via its Unique (6989586621679010923):
( Id
{idStableName = "main:Main:$fFooInt", idUnique = Unique
8214565720323784705}
, CastE
(VarE
(Id
{ idStableName = "main:Main:$cfoo"
, idUnique = Unique 6989586621679010923 <---- HERE
})))
At first, I thought I would use the Unique associated with every Name to
make a lookup. This is completely reliable within one GHC compilation,
but I've read in the docs that it's not stable across multiple
invocations? What does that mean for my case?
Another thing I notice is that type-class methods are not generated at
the core level. I have, for example, this method call that provides it
the instance dictionary,
(AppE
(AppE
(VarE
(Id
{ idStableName = "main:Main:foo"
, idUnique = Unique 8214565720323784707 <---- MISSING
}))
(TypE (Typ "Int")))
(VarE
(Id
{ idStableName = "main:Main:$fFooInt"
, idUnique = Unique 8214565720323784705
})))
But the "main:Main:foo" (8214565720323784707) is not produced in the
CoreProgram, it seems. My compile step is very simple:
compile ::
GHC.GhcMonad m
=> GHC.ModSummary
-> m [CoreSyn.Bind GHC.Var]
compile modSummary = do
parsedModule <- GHC.parseModule modSummary
typecheckedModule <- GHC.typecheckModule parsedModule
desugared <- GHC.desugarModule typecheckedModule
let binds = GHC.mg_binds (GHC.dm_core_module desugared)
pure binds
It simply gets the bindings and that's all from the ModGuts.
mg_binds :: !CoreProgram
Two questions:
1) How do I recognize class methods when I see one, like the
"main:Main:foo" above?
Maybe this? isClassOpId_maybe :: Id -> Maybe Class
Is an "op" what GHC calls type-class methods?
2) If I compile e.g. ghc-prim and that generates a binding Name with ID
123, and then I compile base -- will the ID 123 be re-used by base
for something else, or will any reference to 123 in the compiled
Names for base refer ONLY to that one in ghc-prim? In other words,
when GHC loads the iface for ghc-prim, does it generate a fresh set
of names for everything in ghc-prim, or does it load them from file?
Cheers!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20181127/31f77cbf/attachment.html>
More information about the ghc-devs
mailing list