rae at cs.brynmawr.edu
Mon Jun 18 03:20:59 UTC 2018
> On Jun 17, 2018, at 10:01 AM, sasa bogicevic <brutallesale at gmail.com> wrote:
> So I guess that we need to check if one of the kinds of two types we are comparing defaults to * (or Type if you will) and then
> add new warning that will be more descriptive as to why the failure happened. Maybe there is a way to check if what we are
> comparing are actually type families so that would make the job easier I guess.
I don't think the problem is particular to `Type` or defaulting. Instead, the problem is when one of the two mismatched types is a type family application where the type family has equations that pattern-match on an invisible parameter, and it's that invisible-parameter matching that's gone awry. Now that I think about it, detecting these particular conditions might be tricky: you might need to edit code in FamInstEnv that does type family equation lookup to return diagnostic information if a match fails. (I would look at reduceTyFamApp_maybe, and perhaps it can return something more interesting than Nothing in the failure case.)
> Richard Eisenberg offered some help on this but I am not sure how to grab hold of him so I'd appreciate any help I could get.
Just email! :)
Thanks for looking into this!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ghc-devs