Combining Bag/OrdList?

[Ben Gamari]

Joachim Breitner <mail at joachim-breitner.de> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Am Samstag, den 02.06.2018, 10:55 -0700 schrieb Jared Weakly:
>> > It looks to me like many of the applications of snocBag should really be using OrdList.
>> 
>> Do you think there's benefit in refactoring to use ordList and then
>> removing snoc/cons from the bag API (instead providing only
>> operations that make no assumptions about ordering)?
>
> would you remove `toList` (which has to fix an ordering)?
>
Yes, this seems unavoidable. However, the documentation would make it
clear that the returned order is arbitrary.

Cheers,

- Ben

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 487 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20180602/3ab0e34a/attachment.sig>