Is it possible to enhance the vector STG registers(Xmm, Ymm, Zmm) with more information?
Simon Peyton Jones
simonpj at microsoft.com
Fri Jul 13 15:12:46 UTC 2018
What is the GlobalVecRegTy field doing?
Don’t you need an Int for the register number, like all the rest?
Generally, sounds good though
S
From: Abhiroop Sarkar <asiamgenius at gmail.com>
Sent: 13 July 2018 14:07
To: Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj at microsoft.com>
Cc: ghc-devs at haskell.org
Subject: Re: Is it possible to enhance the vector STG registers(Xmm, Ymm, Zmm) with more information?
Hello Simon,
Thanks for your response. I had written a patch[1] for this and the approach I took was quite similar to what you pointed out.
data GlobalReg = ...
| XmmReg
(Maybe (Length, Width))
(Maybe GlobalVecRegTy)
data GlobalVecRegTy = Integer | Float
-- Width and Length are already defined
data Width = W8 | W16 | W32 .....
type Length = Int
I wrapped the types inside a `Maybe` because when initializing a GlobalReg (in the `activeStgRegs`[2] function), I was not sure what value to initialize the register with, so I used a `Nothing` when initializing.
I see now in the case of `VanillaReg` it is initialized with the `VGcPtr` constructor: VanillaReg 1 VGcPtr etc
I think I should modify my patch as well to remove the Maybe and initialize with some default Length, Width and GlobalRegTy. Thanks for the help.
Abhiroop
[1] https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4922
[2] https://github.com/ghc/ghc/blob/master/includes/CodeGen.Platform.hs#L450-L623<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fghc%2Fghc%2Fblob%2Fmaster%2Fincludes%2FCodeGen.Platform.hs%23L450&data=02%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Ccb18f3003224456cfd5b08d5e8c19b21%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636670840587296823&sdata=quBJxkG7r6a7ylFqrh4VMgP8y0P1i1Xc79Xj10kV9ts%3D&reserved=0>
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 10:58 AM Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj at microsoft.com<mailto:simonpj at microsoft.com>> wrote:
Abhiroop
Did anyone reply?
My instinct is this. You want to use the same register (say Xmm reg 3) in different ways. We already have this for ‘VanillaReg’:
data GlobalReg
= VanillaReg -- pointers, unboxed ints and chars
Int -- its number
VGcPtr
| …
data VGcPtr = VGcPtr | VNonGcPtr
We use VanillaReg for both pointers and non-pointers, so (VanillaReg 3 VGcPtr) is register 3 used as a pointer, and (VanillaReg 3 VNonGcPtr) is register 3 used as a non-pointer. And notice that globalRegType looks at this field to decide what type to return.
I think you can do exactly the same: add a field to Xmm that explains how you are gong to divide it up. Would that work?
Simon
From: ghc-devs <ghc-devs-bounces at haskell.org<mailto:ghc-devs-bounces at haskell.org>> On Behalf Of Abhiroop Sarkar
Sent: 27 June 2018 22:32
To: ghc-devs at haskell.org<mailto:ghc-devs at haskell.org>
Subject: Is it possible to enhance the vector STG registers(Xmm, Ymm, Zmm) with more information?
Hello all,
I am currently working on adding support for SIMD operations to the native code generator. One of the roadblocks I faced recently was the definition of the `globalRegType` function in "compiler/cmm/CmmExpr.hs". The `globalRegType` function maps the STG registers to the respective `CmmType` datatype.
For Xmm, Ymm, Zmm registers the function defines globalRegType like this: https://github.com/ghc/ghc/blob/master/compiler/cmm/CmmExpr.hs#L585-L587<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fghc%2Fghc%2Fblob%2Fmaster%2Fcompiler%2Fcmm%2FCmmExpr.hs%23L585-L587&data=02%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Ccb18f3003224456cfd5b08d5e8c19b21%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636670840587296823&sdata=Ct2zsaFgEsRTclglezuPAg05zlSWwuyU45KZrrzcZCc%3D&reserved=0>
Consider the case for an Xmm register, the above definition limits an Xmm register to hold only vectors of size 4. However we can store 2 64-bit Doubles or 16 Int8s or 8 Int16s and so on
The function `globalRegType` is internally called by the function `cmmRegType` (https://github.com/ghc/ghc/blob/838b69032566ce6ab3918d70e8d5e098d0bcee02/compiler/cmm/CmmExpr.hs#L275<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fghc%2Fghc%2Fblob%2F838b69032566ce6ab3918d70e8d5e098d0bcee02%2Fcompiler%2Fcmm%2FCmmExpr.hs%23L275&data=02%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Ccb18f3003224456cfd5b08d5e8c19b21%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636670840587296823&sdata=yi3CN5tdL%2FEteEwBRH6Pt%2B3QB7Ji0sGWnnlE02eyMqk%3D&reserved=0>) which is itself used in a number of places in the x86 code generator.
In fact depending on the result of the `cmmRegType` function is another important function `cmmTypeFormat` defined in Format.hs whose result is used to print the actual assembly instruction.
I have extended all the other Format types to include VectorFormats, however this definition of the `globalRegType` seems incorrect to me. Looking at the signature of the function itself:
`globalRegType :: DynFlags -> GlobalReg -> CmmType`
its actually difficult to predict the CmmType by just looking at the GlobalReg in case of Xmm, Ymm, Zmm. So thats why my original question how do I go about solving this. Should I modify the GlobalReg type to contain more information like Width and Length(for Xmm, Ymm, Zmm) or do I somehow pass the length and width information to the globalRegType function?
Thanks
Abhiroop Sakar
--
Kloona - Coming Soon!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20180713/1d799607/attachment.html>
More information about the ghc-devs
mailing list