pattern signatures
Sylvain Henry
sylvain at haskus.fr
Wed Jan 10 21:02:28 UTC 2018
Or maybe "pattern ascription"? "type-ascription" is implied as
"ascription" isn't commonly used for something else (AFAIK).
Sylvain
On 08/01/2018 13:59, Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs wrote:
>
> I like the idea of distinguishing “signatures” from “annotations”.
>
> But then what is currently a “pattern signature” with extension
> -XPatternSignatures, becomes “type annotation in a pattern” or perhaps
> “pattern type-annotation” which is a bit clumsy.
>
> Possibly “type specification” instead of “type annotation”. Thus
> “pattern type-spec” which is snappier.
>
> Simon
>
> *From:*ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-bounces at haskell.org] *On Behalf Of
> *Spiwack, Arnaud
> *Sent:* 08 January 2018 10:11
> *Cc:* Joachim Breitner <mail at joachim-breitner.de>; ghc-devs at haskell.org
> *Subject:* Re: pattern signatures
>
> In my eyes, signatures are something which goes with a definition.
>
> So (a) is a pattern (synonym) signature, while (b) is merely a type
> annotation on a pattern.
>
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 11:23 PM, Iavor Diatchki
> <iavor.diatchki at gmail.com <mailto:iavor.diatchki at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Well, as you say, "pattern signature" makes sense for both, so I
> would expect to use context to disambiguate. If I wanted to be
> explicit about which one I meant, I'd use:
>
> a) "Pattern synonym signature"
>
> b) "Signature on a pattern"
>
> -Iavor
>
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 1:12 PM Joachim Breitner
> <mail at joachim-breitner.de <mailto:mail at joachim-breitner.de>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Am Freitag, den 05.01.2018, 13:42 -0500 schrieb Brandon Allbery:
> > Further complicated by the fact that that form used to be
> called a
> > "pattern signature" with accompanying extension, until that was
> > folded into ScopedTypeVariables extension.
>
> which I find super confusing, because sometimes I want a
> signature on a
> pattern and it is counter-intuitive to me why I should not
> longer use
> the obviously named PatternSignatures extension but rather the
> at first
> glance unrelated ScopedTypeVariable extension.
>
> But I am derailing the discussion a bit.
>
> Cheers,
> Joachim
>
> --
> Joachim Breitner
> mail at joachim-breitner.de <mailto:mail at joachim-breitner.de>
> http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.joachim-breitner.de%2F&data=02%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Ccca9ff6f4b2b4a32e61308d55680514e%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636510031494207475&sdata=%2BWGJXq6S7IrWJzsYIZWdk%2BDa%2BSLtW8CfCiPHitgnArc%3D&reserved=0>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-devs mailing list
> ghc-devs at haskell.org <mailto:ghc-devs at haskell.org>
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmail.haskell.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fghc-devs&data=02%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Ccca9ff6f4b2b4a32e61308d55680514e%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636510031494207475&sdata=L7reldRrJzSuxRhDTFUgNoy8zXHEbW96rqY8TpUeHxI%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-devs mailing list
> ghc-devs at haskell.org <mailto:ghc-devs at haskell.org>
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmail.haskell.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fghc-devs&data=02%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Ccca9ff6f4b2b4a32e61308d55680514e%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636510031494207475&sdata=L7reldRrJzSuxRhDTFUgNoy8zXHEbW96rqY8TpUeHxI%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-devs mailing list
> ghc-devs at haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20180110/d3123a37/attachment.html>
More information about the ghc-devs
mailing list