HsVectInstIn is dead code?

Simon Peyton Jones simonpj at microsoft.com
Fri Apr 20 14:58:19 UTC 2018


Can you comment on this?   You’ve argued for keeping the vectorisation code in, but is this particular data constructor in VectDecl used?


From: ghc-devs <ghc-devs-bounces at haskell.org> On Behalf Of Alan & Kim Zimmerman
Sent: 20 April 2018 14:21
To: ghc-devs <ghc-devs at haskell.org>
Subject: HsVectInstIn is dead code?

If I grep through the GHC source, or do a github search[1]
It seems that HsVectInst exists, and can be renamed, typechecked, zonked, desugared.

But it does not get parse, and does not appear to be introduced in any other way.

Am I missing something? Should it be deleted (as hinted at in one of the comments?)


[1] https://github.com/ghc/ghc/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=HsVectInstIn&type=
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20180420/d88cc411/attachment.html>

More information about the ghc-devs mailing list