cvs-ghc archives

[Gershom B]

You can also get cvs-ghc specific mail at:

https://www.mail-archive.com/cvs-ghc=40haskell.org/

Note: We still have the old list archives. It looks like the list itself =
was deleted on mailman when the old cvs- lists were decomissioned so as t=
o prevent confusion. I think they=E2=80=99ve been inaccessable for years =
so it doesn=E2=80=99t seem like its a pressing concern=3F That said, we c=
an look into hosting the archives with a redirect on archives.haskell.org=
.

Cheers,
Gershom

On September 28, 2017 at 8:32:26 AM, ghc-devs-request=40haskell.org (ghc-=
devs-request=40haskell.org) wrote:
> Send ghc-devs mailing list submissions to
> ghc-devs=40haskell.org
> =20
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> ghc-devs-request=40haskell.org
> =20
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> ghc-devs-owner=40haskell.org
> =20
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than =22Re: Contents of ghc-devs digest...=22
> =20
> =20
> Today's Topics:
> =20
> 1. Re: cvs-ghc archives (Bartosz Nitka)
> =20
> =20
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> =20
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 11:07:43 +0100
> =46rom: Bartosz Nitka =20
> To: ghc-devs Devs =20
> Subject: Re: cvs-ghc archives
> Message-ID:
> =20
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D=22UT=46-8=22
> =20
> I think someone has archived the data for us here
> https://www.mail-archive.com/cvs-all=40haskell.org/.
> I don't have a good way to map the old links to new ones, though.
> =20
> 2017-09-28 11:01 GMT+01:00 Bartosz Nitka :
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was reading a comment that pointed to
> > http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/cvs-ghc/2007-September/038458.html.
> > It's a dead link and I couldn't find any place where cvs-ghc is archi=
ved.
> > I've tried webarchive.
> >
> > Looks like Simon had a simliar problem 4 years ago:
> > http://ghc-devs.haskell.narkive.com/3dIDGsHy/cvs-ghc-archives
> >
> > Is the data forever lost=3F
> >
> > There aren't actually that many references in the source tree:
> > ./libraries/base/configure.ac:=23 See
> > http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/cvs-ghc/2011-September/065980.html
> > ./libraries/base/configure:=23 See
> > http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/cvs-ghc/2011-September/065980.html
> > ./libraries/base/autom4te.cache/output.0:=23 See
> > http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/cvs-ghc/2011-September/065980.html
> > ./rts/linker/Elf.c: * See thread
> > http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/cvs-ghc/2007-September/038458.html
> > ./rts/Linker.c: // see
> > http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/cvs-ghc/2007-September/038570.html
> > ./testsuite/tests/typecheck/should=5Ffail/tcfail201.hs:--
> > http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/cvs-ghc/2008-June/043173.html
> >
> > I'm happy to remove them if that's what we want to do.
> >
> > Coincidentally cvs-ghc=40haskell.org appears 58 times in the GHC sour=
ce
> > tree. Do we want to keep using it=3F
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Bartosz
> =20
> =20
> ------------------------------
> =20
> Subject: Digest =46ooter
> =20
> =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=
=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F
> ghc-devs mailing list
> ghc-devs=40haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
> =20
> =20
> ------------------------------
> =20
> End of ghc-devs Digest, Vol 169, Issue 60
> *****************************************
> =20
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 101 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using AMPGpg
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20170928/2579998a/attachment.sig>