Q: Types in GADT pattern match

[Gabor Greif]

Hi Devs!

I encountered a curious restriction with type signatures (tyvar bindings)
in GADT pattern matches.

GHC won't let me directly capture the refined type structure of GADT
constructors like this:


{-# Language GADTs, ScopedTypeVariables #-}

data Foo a where
  Bar :: Foo [a]

foo :: Foo a -> ()
foo b@(Bar :: Foo [a]) = quux b
  where quux :: Foo [b] -> ()
        quux Bar = ()


I get:


*test.hs:7:8: **error:*

*    • Couldn't match type ‘a1’ with ‘[a]’*

*      ‘a1’ is a rigid type variable bound by*

*        the type signature for:*

*          foo :: forall a1. Foo a1 -> ()*

*        at test.hs:6:1-18*

*      Expected type: Foo a1*

*        Actual type: Foo [a]*


To me it appears that the type refinement established by the GADT pattern
match is not accounted for.

Of course I can write:

foo :: Foo a -> ()
foo b at Bar | (c :: Foo [a]) <- b = quux c
  where quux :: Foo [b] -> ()
        quux Bar = ()

but it feels like a complicated way to do it...

My question is whether this is generally seen as the way to go or whether
ScopedTypeVariables coming from a GADT pattern match should be able to
capture the refined type. To me the latter seems more useful.

Just wanted to feel the waters before writing a ticket about this.

Cheers and thanks,

    Gabor
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20171029/012e0a06/attachment.html>