Manuel M T Chakravarty
chak at justtesting.org
Wed Oct 25 00:02:36 UTC 2017
Why are you saying that?
I think, Moritz is right. Hadrian is supposed to be the build system for 8.4. Adding new functionality for cross-compilation to the old build system is frustrating.
> Brandon Allbery <allbery.b at gmail.com>:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 5:02 AM, Moritz Angermann <moritz.angermann at gmail.com <mailto:moritz.angermann at gmail.com>> wrote:
> However, I am now again at the point where I start hacking on the build
> system, while Hadrian is imminent. And this is quite depressing
> Realistically, while Hadrian going into the tree may be imminent, as I understand it Hadrian becoming the primary build system --- or even a viable alternative build system --- is not. It's more of a repo logistics speed bump. Just let it go for now.
> brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates
> allbery.b at gmail.com <mailto:allbery.b at gmail.com> ballbery at sinenomine.net <mailto:ballbery at sinenomine.net>
> unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net <http://sinenomine.net/>_______________________________________________
> ghc-devs mailing list
> ghc-devs at haskell.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ghc-devs