[Diffusion] [Build Failed] rGHCb8f58d79ee3e: Another improvement to SetLevels
Simon Peyton Jones
simonpj at microsoft.com
Tue Feb 7 17:44:49 UTC 2017
There's something very odd here. I got "stat too good" solidly, so I reduced the number. But Harbormaster consistently allocates more 6.6% more than my 64-bit machine. I have no idea why. I reported this some days ago. It only seems to happen on this test.
Anyway, I have to go home, but I suppose that we can "solve" this by giving it a wider bound. Feel free to do that. Or center it on what Harbormaster says, and I'll get used to filtering out that failure from my own builds.
sorry to leave this loose end. It's annoying
From: noreply at phabricator.haskell.org [mailto:noreply at phabricator.haskell.org]
Sent: 07 February 2017 17:11
To: Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj at microsoft.com>
Subject: [Diffusion] [Build Failed] rGHCb8f58d79ee3e: Another improvement to SetLevels
Harbormaster failed to build B13774: rGHCb8f58d79ee3e: Another improvement to SetLevels!
To: simonpj, Harbormaster
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ghc-devs