Adding ConApp to Core

Carter Schonwald carter.schonwald at gmail.com
Tue Sep 27 17:18:45 UTC 2016


I'm trying to google the System IF spj mentioned earlier in this topic/ or on trac. Google and other search tools are failing me.  Can anyone kindly direct me to what papers or expositions on this system f variant ?

-Carter

> On Sep 25, 2016, at 10:59 AM, Carter Schonwald <carter.schonwald at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Also this whole multi arg thing was something I was hoping to talk with Stephanie and or Richard about at hac phi next month. 
> 
>> On Sunday, September 25, 2016, Carter Schonwald <carter.schonwald at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm in favor as well.  
>> 
>> I've some experiments I'd like to do on ghc (and that work would support me focusing on!!!) that become dramatically simpler  to get the the Simons seal of approval if core already gets multiple arg / simultaneous arg saturated application (a la type are calling or sequent core  ).  
>> :)
>> -Carter 
>> 
>>> On Saturday, September 24, 2016, Manuel M T Chakravarty <chak at justtesting.org> wrote:
>>> I like this. Having the DataCon only in IdDetails always felt a bit off.
>>> 
>>> Manuel
>>> 
>>>> Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs <ghc-devs at haskell.org>:
>>>> 
>>>> Andres, Richard, Stephanie
>>>>  
>>>> The more I think about our idea of introducing ConApp the more I like it.  I wrote it up in a ticket
>>>>  
>>>> https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/12618
>>>>  
>>>> Simon
>>>>  
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> ghc-devs mailing list
>>>> ghc-devs at haskell.org
>>>> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
>>> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20160927/2914d20f/attachment.html>


More information about the ghc-devs mailing list