Better perf?
Simon Peyton Jones
simonpj at microsoft.com
Tue Sep 13 15:38:16 UTC 2016
I’m getting this perf improvement from T5837, which is type-function heavy. Is anyone else seeing this
bytes allocated value is too low:
(If this is because you have improved GHC, please
update the test so that GHC doesn't regress again)
Expected T5837(normal) bytes allocated: 48507272 +/-10%
Lower bound T5837(normal) bytes allocated: 43656544
Upper bound T5837(normal) bytes allocated: 53358000
Actual T5837(normal) bytes allocated: 42384144
Deviation T5837(normal) bytes allocated: -12.6 %
Its good, but I’d quite like to know which patch made the difference. Could it be
commit 03541cbae50f0d1cdf99120ab88698f29a278159
Author: Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj at microsoft.com>
Date: Fri Sep 9 17:42:42 2016 +0100
Be less picky about reporing inaccessible code
Seems implausible, but possible I suppose.
Simon
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20160913/66afc5ef/attachment.html>
More information about the ghc-devs
mailing list