Initial compile time benchmarks
Joachim Breitner
mail at joachim-breitner.de
Wed Mar 30 07:11:08 UTC 2016
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 29.03.2016, 15:29 -0700 schrieb Edward Z. Yang:
> This ticket may be of interest:
>
> https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9630
>
> Deriving costs a lot and we just need someone to figure out what's
> going on.
are you sure that deriving itself costs a lot? I would expect that
deriving itself is reasonably cheap, but results in a lot of
complicated (e.g. recursive) code that later analyzes have to go
through...
http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9557 and tickets linked from
there are also relevant. In fact, there is even a keyword for this
meta-issue:
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/query?status=!closed&keywords=~deriving-perf
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
mail at joachim-breitner.de • https://www.joachim-breitner.de/
XMPP: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F
Debian Developer: nomeata at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20160330/29953ed4/attachment.sig>
More information about the ghc-devs
mailing list