CMM-to-ASM: Register allocation wierdness

[Harendra Kumar]

Sure, I will file a ticket once I have more clarity on the problem. BTW, I
forgot to mention that this is with ghc-7.10.3. I will try to see how
things stand with 8.0.1 at the assembly level though I have not seen any
difference in the benchmark performance. I guess it is better to work off
8.0.1 anyway since things might have changed significantly.

-harendra

On 13 June 2016 at 04:04, Joachim Breitner <mail at joachim-breitner.de> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Am Montag, den 13.06.2016, 00:08 +0530 schrieb Harendra Kumar:
> > Can this be avoided?
>
> hopefully, and you already did some great analysis. But sometimes
> things are moving slow, so if nobody picks it up right away (I think
> think the number of people who know the register allocator is rather
> small), make sure you record your findings in a trac ticket, so that
> they are not lost.
>
> Greetings,
> Joachim
>
> --
>
> Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
>   mail at joachim-breitner.de • https://www.joachim-breitner.de/
>   XMPP: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F
>   Debian Developer: nomeata at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20160613/0e1b4501/attachment.html>