'lub' and 'both' on strictness - what does it mean for products to have different arity?

[Joachim Breitner]

Hi,

Am Freitag, den 19.02.2016, 12:27 -0500 schrieb Ömer Sinan Ağacan:
> Should I try replacing these cases with panics and try to validate?

of course you can, but I have seen cases where due to type families and
stuff you can have a type-correct program that „looks wrongly typed“
from the point of view of the strictness analyzer. So in these cases it
is indeed the right thing to throw away the conflicting information and
continue.

Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
  mail at joachim-breitner.de • https://www.joachim-breitner.de/
  XMPP: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F
  Debian Developer: nomeata at debian.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20160220/d8e3d43e/attachment.sig>