Measuring performance of GHC

[Joachim Breitner]

Hi,

Am Dienstag, den 06.12.2016, 17:14 -0500 schrieb Ben Gamari:
> Joachim Breitner <mail at joachim-breitner.de> writes:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Am Dienstag, den 06.12.2016, 19:27 +0000 schrieb Michal Terepeta:
> > > (isn't that's what perf.haskell.org is doing?)
> > 
> > for compiler performance, it only reports the test suite perf test
> > number so far.
> > 
> > If someone modifies the nofib runner to give usable timing results for
> > the compiler, I can easily track these numbers as well.
> > 
> 
> I have a module [1] that does precisely this for the PITA project (which
> I still have yet to put up on a public server; I'll try to make time for
> this soon).

Are you saying that the compile time measurements of a single run of
the compiler are actually useful? I’d expect we first have to make
nofib call the compiler repeatedly.

Also, shouldn’t this then become part of nofib-analye?

Greetings,
Joachim



-- 
Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
  mail at joachim-breitner.de • https://www.joachim-breitner.de/
  XMPP: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F
  Debian Developer: nomeata at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20161206/477e1707/attachment.sig>