Proposal: Include GHC version target in libraries' description

Alexander Berntsen alexander at plaimi.net
Mon Sep 14 11:59:28 UTC 2015


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 14/08/15 11:30, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
>   -make GHC a distribution and use that field,
>   -use the platform feature,
>   -make a new field -- bundled-with, bundles, or similar,
>   -or use the package collection feature.
> 
> [L]et's make a decision.
I get the feeling nobody liked my original proposal of just writing it
in the .cabal file, so I'm reluctant to put effort into a set of patches
that will be rejected. On the other hand I see no progress here. Does
nobody care? I am keen on hacking on either solution if someone would
just give some sort of acknowledgement here.
- -- 
Alexander
alexander at plaimi.net
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=MEGt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the ghc-devs mailing list