Shared data type for extension flags

[Adam Sandberg Eriksson]

How about ghc-datatypes?

ghc-core-data seems like it would have something to do with the Core
language and ghc-integration sounds like it is a layer on top of ghc.

Using the -types suffix has quite som precedence [1] for packages
defining shared datatypes (as does the -core suffix), but given Malcolms
comment it is perhaps not a good fit for GHC.

[1]: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/search?terms=types

Adam Sandberg Eriksson


On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, at 05:50 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 4:28 AM, malcolm.wallace
> <malcolm.wallace at me.com> wrote:
>> "ghc-types" sounds like a package for fancy type hackery.  I would
>> never think to find language extension flags in such a place.  How
>> about "ghc-package-db", or "ghc-language-extensions"?
>
> ghc-integration ghc-core-data
>
> --
> brandon s allbery kf8nh                               sine nomine
> associates allbery.b at gmail.com ballbery at sinenomine.net unix, openafs,
> kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad        http://sinenomine.net
> _________________________________________________
> ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs at haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20150910/354827dc/attachment.html>