ArrayArrays
Simon Peyton Jones
simonpj at microsoft.com
Tue Sep 8 12:10:19 UTC 2015
| Without any unlifted kind, we need
| - ArrayArray#
| - a set of new/read/write primops for every element type,
| either built-in or made from unsafeCoerce#
|
| With the unlifted kind, we would need
| - ArrayArray#
| - one set of new/read/write primops
|
| With levity polymorphism, we would need
| - none of this, Array# can be used
I don't think levity polymorphism will work here. The code for a function needs to know whether an intermediate value of type 'a' is strict or not. It HAS to choose (unless we compile two versions of every function). So I don't see how to be polymorphic over a type variable that can range over both lifted and unlifted types.
The only reason that 'error' is levity-polymorphic over both lifted and unlifted types is that it never returns!
error :: forall (a :: AnyKind). String -> a
the code for error never manipulates a value of type 'a', so all is well. But it's an incredibly special case.
Simon
More information about the ghc-devs
mailing list