vectorisation code?

[Herbert Valerio Riedel]

On 2015-01-22 at 14:59:51 +0100, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
> The current situation is that DPH is not being built or maintained at
> all. Given this state of affairs, it is hard to justify keeping it
> around---DPH is just bitrotting.
>
> I am proposing that we reconnect it to the build and keep it building,
> putting it in minimal maintenance mode. 

Ok, but how do we avoid issues like

 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.haskell.ghc.devel/5645/

in the future then? DPH became painful back then, because we didn't know
what to do with 'vector' (which as a package at the time also suffered
from neglect of maintainership)


Cheers,
  hvr