Unlifted data types
takenobu.hs at gmail.com
Tue Dec 29 09:54:08 UTC 2015
Apologies if I'm missing context.
Is it more better that "Unlifted" kind is other name, such as
"BoxedUnlifted", "Bul", "%",... ?
I'm studying Unlifted data types .
It's good proposals to optimize code by users.
But I worry that newcomers may be confusing about its kind name.
In my understanding , "unlifted" types may include "unboxed, unlifted"
But "unlifted" kind does not include "unboxed, unlifted" types.
I wish you a happy new year.
2015-09-04 17:03 GMT+09:00 Edward Z. Yang <ezyang at mit.edu>:
> Hello friends,
> After many discussions and beers at ICFP, I've written up my current
> best understanding of the unlifted data types proposal:
> Many thanks to Richard, Iavor, Ryan, Simon, Duncan, George, Paul,
> Edward Kmett, and any others who I may have forgotten for crystallizing
> this proposal.
> ghc-devs mailing list
> ghc-devs at haskell.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ghc-devs