Increased memory usage with GHC 7.10.1

Joachim Breitner mail at joachim-breitner.de
Thu Apr 2 12:53:46 UTC 2015


Hi,

Am Donnerstag, den 02.04.2015, 13:47 +0100 schrieb Jan Stolarek:
> I will. But I was curious whether this is only me or is anyone else seeing similar behaviour. And 
> what about performance comparisson between 7.8.4 and 7.10.1? Do we have any numbers?

we have a few numbers between 7.8.3 and HEAD, on
http://ghcspeed-nomeata.rhcloud.com/comparison/
e.g.
http://ghcspeed-nomeata.rhcloud.com/comparison/?exe=2%2B68%2C2%2BL%2Bdefault&ben=320%2C321%2C322%2C323%2C324%2C325%2C326%2C327%2C328%2C329%2C330%2C331%2C332%2C333%2C334%2C335%2C336%2C337%2C338%2C339%2C340%2C341%2C342%2C343%2C344%2C345%2C346%2C347%2C348%2C349%2C350%2C351%2C352%2C353%2C354%2C355%2C356%2C357%2C358%2C359%2C360%2C361%2C362%2C363%2C364%2C365%2C366%2C367%2C368%2C369%2C370%2C371%2C372%2C373%2C374%2C375%2C376%2C377%2C378%2C379%2C380%2C381%2C382%2C383%2C384%2C385%2C386%2C387%2C388%2C389%2C390%2C391%2C392%2C393%2C394%2C395%2C396%2C397%2C398%2C399%2C400%2C401%2C402%2C403%2C404%2C405%2C406%2C407%2C408%2C409%2C410%2C411%2C412%2C413%2C414%2C415%2C416%2C417%2C418%2C419&env=1&hor=false&bas=none&chart=normal+bars
but it does not have numbers on binary size for 7.8.3.

http://ghcspeed-nomeata.rhcloud.com/timeline/#/?exe=2&base=2+68&ben=nofib/size/anna&env=1&revs=1000&equid=on
does not show anything worrying (but only goes back to last October).


Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
  mail at joachim-breitner.dehttp://www.joachim-breitner.de/
  Jabber: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de  • GPG-Key: 0xF0FBF51F
  Debian Developer: nomeata at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20150402/ce19fc1b/attachment.sig>


More information about the ghc-devs mailing list