Call Arity, oneShot or both

[Joachim Breitner]

Hi,


Am Dienstag, den 28.10.2014, 22:02 +0000 schrieb Simon Peyton Jones:
> So I'm all for keeping 'oneShot' in the definition of foldl or
> whatever, even if the analysis spots it. But with a Note please!

Three Notes actually! :-)

I created three mouth-sized commits, each of which can be reviewed
independently:
https://phabricator.haskell.org/D391
https://phabricator.haskell.org/D392
https://phabricator.haskell.org/D393

You can also review the wip/oneShot branch if you prefer that or want to
play around with it.

The Wiki page will see some updates (e.g. moving „Challenges“ to
„Implementation“) when I get to merge these.

Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
  mail at joachim-breitner.de • http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
  Jabber: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de  • GPG-Key: 0xF0FBF51F
  Debian Developer: nomeata at debian.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20141028/78629c86/attachment.sig>