Tentative high-level plans for 7.10.1

[Malcolm Wallace]

On 6 Oct 2014, at 10:28, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote:

> As I'm not totally sure what you mean: Assuming we already had decided
> years ago to follow LTS-style, given GHC 7.0, 7.2, 7.4, 7.6, 7.8 and the
> future 7.10; which of those GHC versions would you have been considered
> a LTS version?


We continue to use 7.2, at least partly because all newer versions of ghc have had significant bugs that affect us.  In fact, 7.2.2 also has a show-stopping bug, but we patched it ourselves to create our very own custom ghc-7.2.3 distribution.

Regards,
    Malcolm