Non-exhaustive pattern-match warning in code-example from "Dependently Typed Programming with Singletons"
Herbert Valerio Riedel
hvriedel at gmail.com
Sun May 18 15:54:42 UTC 2014
Hello *,
I've been experimenting with the code from the "Dependently Typed
Programming with Singletons" paper[1] from the following is derived (modulo some
irrelevant renamings):
{-# LANGUAGE TypeOperators, DataKinds, GADTs, TypeFamilies #-}
module CheckedList where
data Nat = Z | S Nat
data SNat n where
SZ :: SNat Z
SS :: SNat n -> SNat (S n)
infixr 5 :-
data List l t where
Nil :: List Z t
(:-) :: t -> List l t -> List (S l) t
type family n1 :< n2 where
m :< Z = False
Z :< (S m) = True
(S n) :< (S m) = n :< m
index :: (i :< l) ~ True => List l t -> SNat i -> t
index (x :- _) SZ = x
index (_ :- xs) (SS i) = index xs i
The problem, though, is that with the code above GHC 7.8.2 emits a
warning for the `index` function:
,----
| Pattern match(es) are non-exhaustive
| In an equation for ‘index’: Patterns not matched: Nil _
`----
So I would have expected to workaround that by explicitly wrapping the
length-phantom with the promoted `S` type-constructor, like so
index :: (i :< S l) ~ True => List (S l) t -> SNat i -> t
index (x :- _) SZ = x
index (_ :- xs) (SS i) = index xs i
While this would probably have silenced the pattern-match warning, I now
get a type-checking error I can't seem to get rid of:
,----
| Could not deduce (l1 ~ 'S l0) from the context ((i :< 'S l) ~ 'True)
| bound by the type signature for
| index :: (i :< 'S l) ~ 'True => List ('S l) t -> SNat i -> t
|
| or from ('S l ~ 'S l1)
| bound by a pattern with constructor
| :- :: forall t (l :: Nat). t -> List l t -> List ('S l) t,
| in an equation for ‘index’
|
| or from (i ~ 'S n)
| bound by a pattern with constructor
| SS :: forall (n :: Nat). SNat n -> SNat ('S n),
| in an equation for ‘index’
|
| ‘l1’ is a rigid type variable bound by
| a pattern with constructor
| :- :: forall t (l :: Nat). t -> List l t -> List ('S l) t,
| in an equation for ‘index’
|
| Expected type: List ('S l0) t
| Actual type: List l1 t
| Relevant bindings include
| xs :: List l1 t
|
| In the first argument of ‘index’, namely ‘xs’
| In the expression: index xs i
`----
Is there a way to tweak the code so that GHC doesn't think there's a
non-exhaustive pattern-match?
Cheers,
HVR
[1]: http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~eir/papers/2012/singletons/paper.pdf
More information about the ghc-devs
mailing list