Offering GHC builder build slaves

[Joachim Breitner]

Hi,

Am Samstag, den 07.06.2014, 12:21 +0200 schrieb Páli Gábor János:
> 2014-06-07 0:17 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Kowalczyk <fuuzetsu at fuuzetsu.co.uk>:
> > It'd be a shame to have
> > various test results from multiple machines but not use them.
> 
> I see what you mean.  But I would also feel strange to mark the test
> results failed if only a few of them fail.  Note that the testsuite
> summaries are forwarded to the ghc-builds mailing list so they are
> published and archived.

ideally, these would be collected in a meaningful way, so that one can
see „Commit 123 changed the number of failing tests from 2 to 3“ or
„Test T1234 fails since 1.1.2014“ or so. Ideally together with
performance numbers („This commit improved nofib by x%“) and nice
graphs.

It must be possible to collect and present such results that without
reinventing the wheel, I just haven’t seen such a tool yet.

(And I know that „we should have X“ mails are not very useful...)

Greetings from Zürich,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
  mail at joachim-breitner.de • http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
  Jabber: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de  • GPG-Key: 0xF0FBF51F
  Debian Developer: nomeata at debian.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20140607/a0fb51fb/attachment.sig>