Updating Haddock submodule
Simon Peyton Jones
simonpj at microsoft.com
Tue Jul 15 08:13:29 UTC 2014
I used stash to avoid creating and then deleting a branch. No deeper reason.
| -----Original Message-----
| From: Jan Stolarek [mailto:jan.stolarek at p.lodz.pl]
| Sent: 15 July 2014 08:53
| To: ghc-devs at haskell.org
| Cc: Simon Peyton Jones; Herbert Valerio Riedel; 'Austin Seipp'
| Subject: Re: Updating Haddock submodule
| I'm surprised that you used 'git stash'/'git stash pop'. Why not use a
| branch and then merge it into master (possibly with rebasing)? That's
| what I would do. But if for some reason it is necessary to use 'git
| stash' then it would be good to have that reason documented in the
| workflow as well.
More information about the ghc-devs