Phab vs. Trac

[Simon Peyton Jones]

PS: and if we agree this convention can we document it in our Working Conventions pages?

S

| -----Original Message-----
| From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-bounces at haskell.org] On Behalf Of Simon
| Peyton Jones
| Sent: 14 July 2014 20:25
| To: Richard Eisenberg; ghc-devs at haskell.org
| Subject: RE: Phab vs. Trac
| 
| | Here is my proposed answer: The Phab reviews are a good place for code-
| | specific commentary/feedback but Trac is better for design issues. A
| rule
| | of thumb might be to pretend that Phab comments are all forgotten in a
| | month or two, whereas Trac comments are expected to be around in 5
| years.
| 
| Good criterion.  I'm littering the Notes in GHC with references to Trac
| tickets, on the grounds that those tickets will be permanently available.
| Let's not commit to making the Phab stuff permanently available too.  (Of
| course it may be.)
| 
| Simon
| _______________________________________________
| ghc-devs mailing list
| ghc-devs at haskell.org
| http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs