High-level Cmm code and stack allocation
Carter Schonwald
carter.schonwald at gmail.com
Sun Jan 5 00:15:53 UTC 2014
hey Herbert,
I generally start with looking at the primops.cmm file for examples
https://github.com/ghc/ghc/blob/master/rts/PrimOps.cmm#L572-L588
otoh, the comments in cmmparse.y indicate that's not quite "kosher"? or
maybe the comments are a lie?
https://github.com/ghc/ghc/blob/master/compiler/cmm/CmmParse.y#L24-L28
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Herbert Valerio Riedel <hvr at gnu.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> According to Note [Syntax of .cmm files],
>
> | There are two ways to write .cmm code:
> |
> | (1) High-level Cmm code delegates the stack handling to GHC, and
> | never explicitly mentions Sp or registers.
> |
> | (2) Low-level Cmm manages the stack itself, and must know about
> | calling conventions.
> |
> | Whether you want high-level or low-level Cmm is indicated by the
> | presence of an argument list on a procedure.
>
> However, while working on integer-gmp I've been noticing in
> integer-gmp/cbits/gmp-wrappers.cmm that even though all Cmm procedures
> have been converted to high-level Cmm, they still reference the 'Sp'
> register, e.g.
>
>
> #define GMP_TAKE1_RET1(name,mp_fun) \
> name (W_ ws1, P_ d1) \
> { \
> W_ mp_tmp1; \
> W_ mp_result1; \
> \
> again: \
> STK_CHK_GEN_N (2 * SIZEOF_MP_INT); \
> MAYBE_GC(again); \
> \
> mp_tmp1 = Sp - 1 * SIZEOF_MP_INT; \
> mp_result1 = Sp - 2 * SIZEOF_MP_INT; \
> ... \
>
>
> So is this valid high-level Cmm code? What's the proper way to allocate
> Stack (and/or Heap) memory from high-level Cmm code?
>
> Cheers,
> hvr
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-devs mailing list
> ghc-devs at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20140104/0d191d6a/attachment.html>
More information about the ghc-devs
mailing list