Extending fold/build fusion
Akio Takano
tkn.akio at gmail.com
Fri Jan 3 14:20:38 UTC 2014
Hi,
I have been thinking about how foldl' can be turned into a good consumer,
and I came up with something that I thought would work. So I'd like to ask
for opinions from the ghc devs: if this idea looks good, if it is a known
bad idea, if there is a better way to do it, etc.
The main idea is to have an extended version of foldr:
-- | A mapping between @a@ and @b at .
data Wrap a b = Wrap (a -> b) (b -> a)
foldrW
:: (forall e. Wrap (f e) (e -> b -> b))
-> (a -> b -> b) -> b -> [a] -> b
foldrW (Wrap wrap unwrap) f z0 list0 = wrap go list0 z0
where
go = unwrap $ \list z' -> case list of
[] -> z'
x:xs -> f x $ wrap go xs z'
This allows the user to apply an arbitrary "worker-wrapper" transformation
to the loop.
Using this, foldl' can be defined as
newtype Simple b e = Simple { runSimple :: e -> b -> b }
foldl' :: (b -> a -> b) -> b -> [a] -> b
foldl' f initial xs = foldrW (Wrap wrap unwrap) g id xs initial
where
wrap (Simple s) e k a = k $ s e a
unwrap u = Simple $ \e -> u e id
g x next acc = next $! f acc x
The wrap and unwrap functions here ensure that foldl' gets compiled into a
loop that returns a value of 'b', rather than a function 'b -> b',
effectively un-CPS-transforming the loop.
I put preliminary code and some more explanation on Github:
https://github.com/takano-akio/ww-fusion
Thank you,
Takano Akio
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20140103/f9b3853b/attachment.html>
More information about the ghc-devs
mailing list