Status and future of the LLVM backend

[Ben Gamari]

Joachim Breitner <mail at joachim-breitner.de> writes:

> Hi,
>
>
> Am Montag, den 01.12.2014, 09:42 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
>> Am Sonntag, den 30.11.2014, 18:49 -0500 schrieb Ben Gamari:
>> > I suspect that it this is the gold issue. I should have looked at your
>> > command line a bit more carefully; I suspect you want 
>> > 
>> >     SRC_HC_OPTS     += -optl-B/usr/bin/ld.gold
>> >     
>> > Hopefully this will do it; at least the option appears to make it to the
>> > right phase now.
>> 
>> Trying it right now...
>
> no success, same error:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=ghc&arch=armhf&ver=7.8.20141119-6&stamp=1417438953&file=log
>
Is there any way you could poke around at the state of the tree after
the failure? It would be nice to confirm that this is in fact that
bfd/gold issue and perhaps figure out why ld.gold isn't being used.

Otherwise I can try to reproduce this on my ARM box.

Cheers,

- Ben
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 472 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20141201/c1ef43ca/attachment.sig>