Moving Haddock *development* out of GHC tree

[Alan & Kim Zimmerman]

Ok thanks.

I am travelling at the moment,  will try this in a few days.

Alan
On 26 Aug 2014 11:23 AM, "Mateusz Kowalczyk" <fuuzetsu at fuuzetsu.co.uk>
wrote:

> On 08/25/2014 01:21 PM, Alan & Kim Zimmerman wrote:
> > What happens in the case of a change to the dev branch of ghc that
> requires
> > a patch to haddock as well, how does that patch get added to phabricator,
> > or is there a separate process?
> >
> > A case in point is https://phabricator.haskell.org/D157 with matching
> > change at
> https://github.com/alanz/haddock/tree/wip/landmine-param-family
> >
> > Regards
> >   Alan
> >
>
> You need to push the patch against the Haddock ghc-head branch and
> update the submodule reference to point at your patch. I don't think
> that you need to do anything special for Phabricator unless it does some
> weird checking out instead of using whatever references GHC points to.
>
>
> --
> Mateusz K.
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-devs mailing list
> ghc-devs at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20140826/ca95164e/attachment.html>