[GHC] #9434: GHC.List.reverse does not fuse
Dan Doel
dan.doel at gmail.com
Fri Aug 15 16:45:12 UTC 2014
Isn't this kind of thing fixed for other functions by rewriting back into
the direct recursive definition if no fusion happens?
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 11:41 AM, David Feuer <david.feuer at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm having trouble when it doesn't fuse—it ends up with duplicate bindings
> at the top level, because build gets inlined n times, and the result lifted
> out. Nothing's *wrong* with the code, except that there are multiple copies
> of it.
> On Aug 15, 2014 10:58 AM, "GHC" <ghc-devs at haskell.org> wrote:
>
>> #9434: GHC.List.reverse does not fuse
>>
>> -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
>> Reporter: dfeuer | Owner:
>> Type: bug | Status: new
>> Priority: normal | Milestone:
>> Component: | Version: 7.9
>> libraries/base | Keywords:
>> Resolution: | Architecture: Unknown/Multiple
>> Operating System: | Difficulty: Easy (less than
>> 1
>> Unknown/Multiple | hour)
>> Type of failure: Runtime | Blocked By:
>> performance bug | Related Tickets:
>> Test Case: |
>> Blocking: |
>> Differential Revisions: |
>>
>> -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
>>
>> Comment (by simonpj):
>>
>> Great. Just check that when fusion ''doesn't'' take place, the result is
>> good. And do a `nofib` comparison for good luck. Then submit a patch.
>>
>> Thanks for doing all this work on fusion, David.
>>
>> Simon
>>
>> --
>> Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9434#comment:2>
>> GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
>> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-devs mailing list
> ghc-devs at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20140815/61426428/attachment.html>
More information about the ghc-devs
mailing list