[commit: ghc] master: Bump haddock.base max_bytes_used (8df7fea)
Joachim Breitner
mail at joachim-breitner.de
Mon Aug 4 11:08:31 UTC 2014
Hi,
Am Montag, den 04.08.2014, 12:02 +0100 schrieb Edward Z.Yang:
> Yes, on my box, this test is now failing (because the stat is too good):
>
> Expected haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used: 127954488 +/-10%
> Lower bound haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used: 115159039
> Upper bound haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used: 140749937
> Actual haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used: 113167424
> Deviation haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used: -11.6 %
ugh.
What are your compilation settings? Plain "validate"?
Looks like the ghcspeed instance settings still don’t quite match what
validate does...
But I don’t see anything in
mk/validate-settings.mk
which would yield different results than
echo 'GhcLibHcOpts += -O -dcore-lint' >> mk/build.mk
echo 'GhcStage2HcOpts += -O -dcore-lint' >> mk/build.mk
I’m starting a plain validate run on that machine, to see if it is
compilation settings or some other variable.
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
mail at joachim-breitner.de • http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
Jabber: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de • GPG-Key: 0xF0FBF51F
Debian Developer: nomeata at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20140804/b7d41091/attachment.sig>
More information about the ghc-devs
mailing list