[commit: ghc] master: Bump haddock.base max_bytes_used (8df7fea)

Joachim Breitner mail at joachim-breitner.de
Mon Aug 4 11:08:31 UTC 2014


Am Montag, den 04.08.2014, 12:02 +0100 schrieb Edward Z.Yang:
> Yes, on my box, this test is now failing (because the stat is too good):
>     Expected    haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used: 127954488 +/-10%
>     Lower bound haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used: 115159039 
>     Upper bound haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used: 140749937 
>     Actual      haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used: 113167424 
>     Deviation   haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used:     -11.6 %


What are your compilation settings? Plain "validate"?

Looks like the ghcspeed instance settings still don’t quite match what
validate does...

But I don’t see anything in 
which would yield different results than
        echo 'GhcLibHcOpts += -O -dcore-lint'  >> mk/build.mk
        echo 'GhcStage2HcOpts += -O -dcore-lint'  >> mk/build.mk

I’m starting a plain validate run on that machine, to see if it is
compilation settings or some other variable.


Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
  mail at joachim-breitner.dehttp://www.joachim-breitner.de/
  Jabber: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de  • GPG-Key: 0xF0FBF51F
  Debian Developer: nomeata at debian.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20140804/b7d41091/attachment.sig>

More information about the ghc-devs mailing list