[commit: ghc] master: Bump haddock.base max_bytes_used (8df7fea)
Edward Z. Yang
ezyang at mit.edu
Mon Aug 4 11:02:48 UTC 2014
Yes, on my box, this test is now failing (because the stat is too good):
Expected haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used: 127954488 +/-10%
Lower bound haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used: 115159039
Upper bound haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used: 140749937
Actual haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used: 113167424
Deviation haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used: -11.6 %
Cheers,
Edward
Excerpts from Simon Peyton Jones's message of 2014-08-04 08:21:50 +0100:
> Ha. max_bytes_used is vulnerable to exactly when gc strikes, so I'm disinclined to get stressed about this. I was mis-reading it as bytes-allocated. Interestingly it doesn't happen for me.
>
> Simon
>
> | -----Original Message-----
> | From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-bounces at haskell.org] On Behalf Of
> | Joachim Breitner
> | Sent: 01 August 2014 22:27
> | To: ghc-devs at haskell.org
> | Subject: Re: [commit: ghc] master: Bump haddock.base max_bytes_used
> | (8df7fea)
> |
> | Hi,
> |
> |
> | Am Freitag, den 01.08.2014, 20:28 +0000 schrieb Simon Peyton Jones:
> | > Urk. It's quite surprising that this particular change would
> | increase allocation significantly.
> | > I wonder whether it just pushed it over the threshold.
> |
> | I’m confident it was not just that:
> |
> | ~/logs $ fgrep 'Deviation haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used' $(cd
> | ghc-master; git log --oneline --first-parent
> | db19c665ec5055c2193b2174519866045aeff09a..HEAD | cut -d\ -f1| (cd ..;
> | while read x ; do test -e $x.log && echo $x.log; done) |tac )|tail -n
> | 25
> | 6fa6caa.log: Deviation haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used:
> | 2.2 %
> | a0ff1eb.log: Deviation haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used: -
> | 1.0 %
> | 0be7c2c.log: Deviation haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used:
> | 2.2 %
> | dc7d3c2.log: Deviation haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used:
> | 2.2 %
> | 7381cee.log: Deviation haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used:
> | 2.2 %
> | fe2d807.log: Deviation haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used:
> | 2.2 %
> | bfaa179.log: Deviation haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used: -
> | 0.9 %
> | 1ae5fa4.log: Deviation haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used:
> | 11.0 %
> | c97f853.log: Deviation haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used:
> | 11.0 %
> | fd47e26.log: Deviation haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used:
> | 11.2 %
> | bdf0ef0.log: Deviation haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used:
> | 11.1 %
> | 58ed1cc.log: Deviation haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used:
> | 11.0 %
> | 1c1ef82.log: Deviation haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used:
> | 11.2 %
> | 52188ad.log: Deviation haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used:
> | 11.0 %
> | 3b9fe0c.log: Deviation haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used:
> | 11.2 %
> | 6483b8a.log: Deviation haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used:
> | 11.0 %
> | 9d9a554.log: Deviation haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used:
> | 11.2 %
> | 028630a.log: Deviation haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used:
> | 11.2 %
> | aab5937.log: Deviation haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used:
> | 11.0 %
> | 6c06db1.log: Deviation haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used:
> | 11.0 %
> | 2989ffd.log: Deviation haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used:
> | 11.1 %
> | d4d4bef.log: Deviation haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used:
> | 11.2 %
> | 8df7fea.log: Deviation haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used: -
> | 0.0 %
> | 3faff73.log: Deviation haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used: -
> | 0.0 %
> | 02975c9.log: Deviation haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used: -
> | 0.1 %
> |
> |
> | (If this were a bytes_allocated test I could also show you nice graphs
> | like http://ghcspeed-nomeata.rhcloud.com/timeline/?exe=2&base=2%
> | 2B68&ben=tests%2Falloc%2FT6048&env=1&revs=50&equid=on but I didn’t add
> | the max_bytes_used tests yet.)
> |
> | Interestingly, bytes_allocated did not change a bit!
> |
> | Greetings,
> | Joachim
> |
> | --
> | Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
> | mail at joachim-breitner.de • http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
> | Jabber: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de • GPG-Key: 0xF0FBF51F
> | Debian Developer: nomeata at debian.org
>
More information about the ghc-devs
mailing list