Overloaded record fields: we ought to change the name of FldTy

[Johan Tibell]

Hi,

I'm currently watching the Skills Matter talks you gave (great!) and I'm
slightly worried that we're going to expose beginners (and intermediate
users!) to a name called FldTy, which might be OK for a GHC-internal name,
but is not very readable.

If this is going to be exposed to users, could we name is something
readable, like FieldType, Field, or something similar?

-- Johan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20140430/8dd4d204/attachment.html>