optllvm failures

[Daniel Fischer]

On Thursday 24 April 2014, 14:04:13, Austin Seipp wrote:
> Can you try another LLVM version? LLVM 3.2 has been known to be
> particularly problematic - I believe me and David looked into this a
> while back, and we couldn't get even get the compiler to bootstrap
> with it at one point, let alone figure out what the hell was going on
> (I'll see if I can find the ticket related to this). LLVM 3.3 or LLVM
> 3.4 should work just fine, and you can put them on the front of your
> $PATH before running the testsuite to check this.

Okay, I got myself a 3.4, and it seems to work. I'll re-run the testsuite and 
see what failures remain.