Help with coercion & roles?

[Conal Elliott]

Hi Richard,

I'm working on compiling Haskell to hardware, as outlined at
https://github.com/conal/lambda-ccc/blob/master/doc/notes.md (with links to
a few recent blog posts). The first step is to convert Core into other Core
that evaluates to a reified form, represented as a type-parametrized GADT.
This GADT (in `LambdaCCC.Lambda`):

> data E :: (* -> *) -> (* -> *) where ...

The parameter is also type-parametrized, and is for the primitives. I have
such a type designed for hardware generation (in `LambdaCCC.Prim`)

> data Prim :: * -> * where ...

and then the combination of the two:

> type EP = E Prim

So that's what `EP` is.

With `-ddump-tc`, I get

> TYPE CONSTRUCTORS
>   ...
>   E :: (* -> *) -> * -> *
>   data E ($a::* -> *) $b
>     No C type associated
>     Roles: [representational, nominal]
>     RecFlag NonRecursive, Not promotable
>     = ...
>   EP :: * -> *
>   type EP = E Prim

The use of `EP` rather than the more general `E` is only temporary, while
I'm learning more details of Core (and of HERMIT which I'm using to
manipulate Core).

I'm now working on reification in the presence of casts. The rule I'm
trying to implement is

> evalEP e |> co  -->  evalEP (e |> co').

Here, `evalEP :: EP a -> a` and `co :: a ~ b`, so `co' :: EP a ~ EP b`.

I'm trying to build `co'` from `co`, which led to these questions.

So what do you think? Is there a sound coercion I can build for `co'`?

-- Conal


On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Richard Eisenberg <eir at cis.upenn.edu>wrote:

> Hi Conal,
>
> In your case, the `_N` on the argument to NTCo:HasIf[0] is correct -- the
> `HasIf` class indeed has a nominal parameter. So, it seems that this part,
> at least, is OK.
>
> What's the -ddump-tc on EP? Is EP's role nominal? (I think so, given what
> you're saying.) If that's the case, you won't be able to pass the result of
> NTCo:HasIf[0] to a coercion built from EP.
>
> Popping up a level, what are you trying to do here? If EP's role is indeed
> nominal, then I don't believe there's a fix here, as the coercion it seems
> you're trying to build may be unsound. (It looks to me like you want
> something proving `EP (Bool -> Bool -> Bool -> Bool) ~R EP (HasIf Bool)`,
> but if EP's role is nominal, then this is indeed bogus.)
>
> Richard
>
> On Apr 14, 2014, at 2:23 PM, Conal Elliott <conal at conal.net> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the pointers! I don't quite know how to get to the form you
> recommend from the existing coercion, which is `Simple.NTCo:HasIf[0]
> <GHC.Types.Bool>_N`. (Note the `_N`.) I got that coercion in GHC 7.8.2 from
> the following code:
>
> > class HasIf a where
> >   ifThenElse :: Bool -> a -> a -> a
> >
> > instance HasIf Bool where
> >   ifThenElse i t e = (i && t) || (not i && e)
>
> With `--dump-tc`, I see
>
> > TYPE SIGNATURES
> > TYPE CONSTRUCTORS
> >   HasIf :: * -> Constraint
> >   class HasIf a
> >     Roles: [nominal]
> >     RecFlag NonRecursive
> >     ifThenElse :: Bool -> a -> a -> a
> > COERCION AXIOMS
> >   axiom Main.NTCo:HasIf :: HasIf a = Bool -> a -> a -> a
> > INSTANCES
> >   instance HasIf Bool -- Defined at ../test/HasIf.hs:4:10
>
> Do I need to convert the nominal coercion I got from GHC
> (`Simple.NTCo:HasIf[0] <GHC.Types.Bool>_N` in this case) to a
> representational one? If so, how?
> My current formulation (tweaked to use `mkSubCo` and `mkAppCo`) is to
> apply `mkAppCo (mkSubCo (Refl Nominal ep))` to the given coercion, which
> then produces
>
> > (LambdaCCC.Lambda.EP (Sym (Simple.NTCo:HasIf[0] <GHC.Types.Bool>_N)))_R
>
> And still I get "Role incompatibility: expected nominal, got
> representational in `Sym (Simple.NTCo:HasIf[0] <GHC.Types.Bool>_N)`".
>
> I also tried wrapping `mkSubCo` around the entire coercion (applying
> `mkSubCo . mkAppCo (Refl Nominal ep)`), and I see the same result:
>
> > (LambdaCCC.Lambda.EP (Sym (Simple.NTCo:HasIf[0] <GHC.Types.Bool>_N)))_R
>
> -- Conal
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:39 AM, Richard Eisenberg <eir at cis.upenn.edu>wrote:
>
>> I agree with Simon, but just `Sub` the `<LambdaCCC.Lambda.EP>_N`, not the
>> whole coercion.
>>
>> There are actually two problems here. The one Simon identified, and also
>> the fact that Simple.NTCo:HasIf[0] produces a representational coercion.
>> How do I know? Because of the `NT` -- it's a newtype axiom and must produce
>> representational coercions. Furthermore, unless the newtype definition is
>> inferred to require a nominal parameter, the newtype would expect a
>> representational coercion, not the nominal one you are passing. Check the
>> dump (using -ddump-tc) of the newtype axiom to be sure.
>>
>> Though putting a `Sub` on `<EP>` and changing the Refl constructor on
>> `<Bool>` would work, you would then be violating an invariant of GHC's
>> Coercion type: that we prefer `TyConAppCo tc ...` over `AppCo (Refl
>> (TyConApp tc [])) ...`.
>>
>> In sum, here is the coercion I think you want:
>>
>> (LambdaCCC.Lambda.EP (Sym (Simple.NTCo:HasIf[0] <GHC.Types.Bool>_R)))_R
>>
>> This is one of the problems with roles -- they are *very* fiddly within
>> GHC, and it's hard for a non-expert in roles to get them right.
>>
>> Have you seen docs/core-spec/core-spec.pdf? That is updated w.r.t. roles
>> and may be of help.
>>
>> Let me know if I can help further!
>> Richard
>>
>> On Apr 14, 2014, at 5:45 AM, Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj at microsoft.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I think you need a ‘Sub’.
>>
>> A cast  (e `cast` g) requires a representational coercion.  I think you
>> have given it a (stronger) nominal one.  Sub gets from one to t’other.
>>
>> Simon
>>
>>  *From:* Glasgow-haskell-users [mailto:glasgow-
>> haskell-users-bounces at haskell.org] *On Behalf Of *Conal Elliott
>> *Sent:* 14 April 2014 06:00
>> *To:* ghc-devs at haskell.org; glasgow-haskell-users at haskell.org
>> *Subject:* Help with coercion & roles?
>>
>>
>> I’m working on a GHC plugin (as part of my Haskell-to-hardware work) and
>> running into trouble with coercions & roles. Error message from Core Lint:
>>
>> Warning: In the expression:
>>
>>
>>
>>   LambdaCCC.Lambda.lamvP#
>>
>>     @ (GHC.Types.Bool → GHC.Types.Bool → GHC.Types.Bool → GHC.Types.Bool)
>>
>>     @ (Simple.HasIf GHC.Types.Bool)
>>
>>     "tpl"#
>>
>>     ((LambdaCCC.Lambda.varP#
>>
>>         @ (GHC.Types.Bool → GHC.Types.Bool → GHC.Types.Bool → GHC.Types.Bool)
>>
>>         "tpl"#)
>>
>>      `cast` (<LambdaCCC.Lambda.EP>_N (Sym (Simple.NTCo:HasIf[0] <GHC.Types.Bool>_N))
>>
>>              ∷ LambdaCCC.Lambda.EP
>>
>>                   (GHC.Types.Bool
>>
>>                    → GHC.Types.Bool → GHC.Types.Bool → GHC.Types.Bool)
>>
>>                   ~#
>>
>>                 LambdaCCC.Lambda.EP (Simple.HasIf GHC.Types.Bool)))
>>
>>  Role incompatibility: expected nominal, got representational
>>
>> in <LambdaCCC.Lambda.EP>_N (Sym (Simple.NTCo:HasIf[0] <GHC.Types.Bool>_N))
>>
>> Do you see anything inconsistent/incompatible in the coercions or roles
>> above? I constructed the nominal EP Refl coercion, and applied it (AppCo)
>> an existing coercion of a simpler type.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -- Conal
>> _______________________________________________
>> Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
>> Glasgow-haskell-users at haskell.org
>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
>>
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20140414/49f2bef1/attachment.html>