Perf tests failing
Johan Tibell
johan.tibell at gmail.com
Sun Apr 6 20:25:22 UTC 2014
Btw, you can set the -fmax-inline-alloc-size flag to a really high value to
prevent inline allocation, if you want to test if that's the culprit.
Inline allocation shouldn't change the amount being allocated though, just
how it's allocated.
T4267 doesn't use byte arrays at all so that should definitely not be
related.
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Johan Tibell <johan.tibell at gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't have a 32-bit machine to test on, but I thought I set the
> InlineByteArrayAlloc test to only run on 64-bit. Feel free to set the
> expected value on 32-bit to whatever you're getting.
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj at microsoft.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Several perf tests have started failing on 32-bit windows. (See
>> below). Some of them have very small allocation anyway, so it may be a
>> library issue. I'm wondering whether it might be a consequence of the new
>> inline byte array stuff. I don't know which commit made this start
>> happening, but it's pretty recent.
>>
>> Johan, did you test on 32 bit?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Simon
>>
>>
>>
>> perf/should_run InlineByteArrayAlloc [stat not good
>> enough] (normal)
>>
>> perf/should_run T4267 [stat not good enough]
>> (normal)
>>
>> perf/should_run T5949 [stat not good enough]
>> (normal)
>>
>> perf/should_run T7619 [stat not good enough]
>> (normal)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ghc-devs mailing list
>> ghc-devs at haskell.org
>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20140406/6e613850/attachment.html>
More information about the ghc-devs
mailing list