alain.odea at gmail.com
Tue Apr 1 12:17:26 UTC 2014
I'm going to read up on Ian's Buildbot work and experiment with that in the meantime. If other challenges come up I'm glad to dive in and help.
> On Apr 1, 2014, at 12:03, Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj at microsoft.com> wrote:
> Indeed, there is no reason not to use Ian et al's Builder stuff. It's one of the options. But it depends on a critical evaluation of what the advantages and disadvantages of different approaches are
> | -----Original Message-----
> | From: Glasgow-haskell-users [mailto:glasgow-haskell-users-
> | bounces at haskell.org] On Behalf Of Karel Gardas
> | Sent: 01 April 2014 12:46
> | To: Joachim Breitner; ghc-devs at haskell.org; Páli Gábor János
> | Cc: glasgow-haskell-users at haskell.org
> | Subject: Re: Buildbots
> | Hi,
> | I'm curious why not to use what's already written by Ian and others and
> | which is currently running again? E.g. Janos Gabor Pali was so nice to
> | start and keep builder server running on
> | http://haskell.inf.elte.hu/builders/
> | Just few are there, but others may be added. Just send email to Janos to
> | get the credentials and more information about what to get from where
> | (recent builder client is needed).
> | Perhaps we shall more advertise this option on GHC's builder wiki page?
> | Thanks,
> | Karel
> | On 04/ 1/14 01:11 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> | > Hence: Travis is _not_ going to be a solution for us; we will want our
> | > own infrastructure.
> | _______________________________________________
> | Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
> | Glasgow-haskell-users at haskell.org
> | http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
> ghc-devs mailing list
> ghc-devs at haskell.org
More information about the ghc-devs