Bit-rotting(?) HUGS-specific code in GHC boot libraries

[Stephen Paul Weber]

Somebody claiming to be Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote:
>Does anyone actually still use/test those packages in HUGS?

I know lots of people still using HUGS.

>(When) can that code be removed?

When enough features become standard that it becomes unnecessary ;)

-- 
Stephen Paul Weber, @singpolyma
See <http://singpolyma.net> for how I prefer to be contacted
edition right joseph
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20130911/a783658c/attachment.pgp>