OverloadedRecordFields status update
adam.gundry at strath.ac.uk
Mon Sep 9 16:01:45 UTC 2013
On 09/09/13 16:53, Gabor Greif wrote:
> On 9/9/13, Adam Gundry <adam.gundry at strath.ac.uk> wrote:
>> On 06/09/13 17:45, Gabor Greif wrote:
>>> On 9/5/13, Adam Gundry <adam.gundry at strath.ac.uk> wrote:
>>>> I have been working on a new extension, OverloadedRecordFields, and it
>>>> is now essentially feature-complete. Unfortunately, I doubt it will make
>>>> it into 7.8, as the changes are quite extensive, but I hope to get it in
>>>> HEAD soon thereafter.
>>> That would be great, it appears to be a great example of
>>> -XConstraintKinds, too!
>> It relies quite heavily on type-level strings (-XDataKinds), if that's
>> what you mean?
> No, I mean ConstraintKinds, I assume all the Has* constraints have
> kind 'Constraint' ?
> (I strongly assume so).
Ah, I see your point. Yes, the kind of `Has` is
* -> Symbol -> * -> Constraint
although it is actually implemented as a typeclass in the base library,
so in this respect it's not particularly special. (Instances of the
typeclass are automatically generated and cannot be given in the normal
More information about the ghc-devs