Status update on overloaded records work?

[Edward Kmett]

That *will* work under Adam's scheme.

-Edward


On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Johan Tibell <johan.tibell at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 2:41 PM, AntC <anthony_clayden at clear.net.nz>wrote:
>
>> - (What I was hoping for but didn't get.)
>>    No compiler flag to suppress creating selector functions.
>>   This would have allowed records to be declared re-using the same name;
>>   but left it entirely to the developer as to how to access them.
>>
>
> Does that mean that this won't work:
>
> module M where
>
> data T1 = C1 { f :: Int }
> data T2 = C2 { f :: Int }
>
> ?
>
> -- Johan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-devs mailing list
> ghc-devs at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20131015/e007611b/attachment.html>