Fixing "breaking packages"
ian at well-typed.com
Fri Mar 1 19:56:16 CET 2013
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 10:33:39AM -0800, Johan Tibell wrote:
> It's the only model I believe scales to e.g. executables that depend on
> thousands of packages
Debian has approximately 30,000 packages (although admittedly I don't
know how many are libraries), and only needs a single version of each
Having a single version of each package (with Hackage using a system
similar to Debian's releases and 'testing' to define the sets of package
versions) would make life a lot easier:
Library maintainers don't need to worry so much about keeping packages
working with old versions of their dependencies.
Authors know that they can use any 2 packages together, and not have to
worry about one of those packages depending on foo 1.* and the other
depending on foo 2.*.
The intractible problem of testing all combinations of versions of
dependencies, to ensure that packages really do build in all the
circumstances that they claim they do, disappears.
More information about the ghc-devs